Responding to Negative Comments

As an editor, I am responsible for responding to people who are unhappy with a point of view expressed in editorial content. I keep several principles in mind when I am responding to negative comments. First of all, I assume that nothing I am going to say is going to change the mind of the person who was offended. While I would like to think that I have strong persuasive powers, the reality is that someone who is unhappy enough to write to the editor about an issue has strongly held beliefs. Secondly, I need to learn from comments and consider if we need to make changes to editorial practices. That doesn’t mean that every comment results in an editorial change, but if there is some sensitivity that is being missed in our editorial process, then we should learn from comments and work on improving our content process.

I use the following principles in crafting a response:

  • Keep it short. While it is tempting to respond point by point to criticism, the longer the response, the more someone can disagree with.
  • Keep it neutral. Affirm their point of view without necessarily agreeing to it. Phrases such as, “I appreciate that you care deeply about this topic.”
  • Keep it positive. Thank them for sharing their views and for being a caring reader.

In addition to these principles, I try to take a breath and distance myself from the comments. Often my first response to a strongly worded negative comment is to get defensive. Responding defensively could do potential harm to the editor-reader relationship, so I let an hour pass before I craft a response. If I am having trouble with my tone in the response, I will draft the response, then have a colleague review it to make sure I am not coming across negatively.

Reader feedback is an important part of the editorial process. Meaningful content can generate both positive and negative responses. A thoughtful editor learns from all feedback and is always evaluating the editorial decision-making process to stay true to the purpose and vision of the organization. And editors are human beings, so naturally we love getting positive comments and are pained by negative comments.

Leave a comment


  1. Thank you for the function. Post aided me a lot

  2. Carla, I enjoyed reading your write-up! Thanks. I do agree that it is important to respond to negative comments with care, maturity and graciousness.

    However, should one invariably stay neutral? Doesn’t an editor have a right to an opinion? Shouldn’t readers too be mature in their approach to issues?

    I feel if this freedom is given, there would be scope to discuss issues in depth. The conversation will be a lot more lively. There is a measure of risk involved but the result could be enlightening.

    • Good points. I think there are two different paths. If the opinions are directly related to the purpose and values of the organization, then the editor can and should express them, but often strong opinions that are not core to organizational mission can be distracting.

      For example, in my work with a mothering organization, I would express opnion about the value of mothering, but I would not stray into political opinion, even if I personally hold strong opinions, because those do not represent the organization.

  1. How to respond to negative comments – Magazine Training International
  2. Magazine Training International » Blog Archive How to respond to negative comments - Magazine Training International
  3. The Art of the Apology | Fine Print Editorial

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

  • Enter your email address to follow the Fine Print Editorial blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

%d bloggers like this: